Column Separation Simulator

What happens inside the pipe after a pump trip: the column decelerates, the pressure line at the pump falls, and if it touches the vapor line −10.3 m (−34 ft) the water tears open — a vapor cavity grows, then the two columns slam back together. Drag rundown time, pipeline length and static head and watch the whole sequence, with the minimum-head verdict and protection guidance. A pumpXSolver engineering tool.

Minimum pressure — the −10.3 m (−34 ft) criterion

Protection measures — before the slam, not after

Trip event — drives the animation

Rigid-column screening — the Michaud downsurge

$$\Delta H_{down}=\frac{L\,V_0}{g\,t_r}\qquad\Longrightarrow\qquad H_{min} = H_s - \frac{L\,V_0}{g\,t_r}\quad\text{(gauge, at the pump)}$$

When the pump dies, the column keeps moving and the static head Hs is what decelerates it; the pump-side pressure falls by the inertia term L·V₀/(g·tr) — the same Michaud relation as gradual valve closure, with the rundown time tr in place of tc. Anchor it: L = 1000 m, V₀ = 1.5 m/s, tr = 2 s → ΔH = 76.5 m; with Hs = 20 m the pump-side head dives to −56.5 m gauge — far past the vapor line. Stretch the rundown to 10 s and the same line stays at +4.7 m: no separation. The static head that stops the column acts on the time \(t_{rev}=V_0 L/(g\,H_s)\) — 7.6 s for the same line.

Vapor-pressure truncation — why the line cannot go below −10.3 m

$$H_{gauge} \ge H_{vapor} \approx -10.3\ \text{m}\ ({-34}\ \text{ft})$$

Liquid water cannot sustain less than its vapor-pressure head: at the moment the computed head line would fall below −10.3 m gauge (full vacuum minus the vapor pressure), the column tears open and a vapor cavity occupies the gap instead. The computed trace is truncated there — the missing head reappears as a growing cavity, and when the reversed column returns the cavity collapses: the two water bodies meet at relative velocity and the rejoin spike reaches \(\Delta H_{up}=a\,\Delta V_{rev}/g\) above the vapor line — for a = 1200 m/s and ΔVrev = 0.75 m/s that is +92 m on top of −10.3 m. This model is a schematic: rigid-column screening with vapor truncation, for ranking risk and protection need — not a substitute for a full elastic-column (MOC) transient study.

The five phases drawn by the animation

PhaseWhat you seeModel event
① RundownPump slows, head at the pump slides down the HGLH(t) = H_s − L·V₀/(g·tr)·t/tr
② Vapor line reachedHead line touches the red dashed line; cavity cracks openHmin would cross −10.3 m
③ Cavity growthGap between pump and column widens, then closes as flow reversesH pinned at vapor head; duration ≈ 0.6·trev
④ Rejoining collision💥 — columns slam; spike on the H(t) stripH jumps to −10.3 + a·ΔVrev/g
⑤ SettlingDamped surging toward steady HsExponential decay envelope

Decision criteria

Minimum gauge head at pumpVerdictAction
< −10.3 m (−34 ft)🔴 Column separationProtection mandatory — air chamber, vacuum-breaking air valve or one-way surge tank; then re-run a full transient study.
−10.3 m … −7 m🟡 Thin marginLess than 3 m above the vapor line — protection review recommended; check warmer-water and longer-line scenarios.
> −7 m🟢 Column holdsNo separation indicated; keep ≥ 2 m margin and re-check after any layout change.

Symbol table

SymbolMeaningUnits
Lpipeline length (pump to reservoir)m / ft
V₀steady flow velocity before the tripm/s
trpump rundown time (to zero speed)s
Hsstatic head (pump to reservoir level)m / ft
apressure-wave speedm/s
trevtime for the static head to stop and reverse the column, V₀L/(gHs)s

Worked anchor (self-check)

Defaults — L = 1000 m, tr = 2 s, Hs = 20 m: ΔHdown = 1000·1.5/(9.807·2) = 76.5 m, minimum head 20 − 76.5 = −56.5 m gauge → 🔴 separation. The head line reaches −10.3 m at tsep = 2·(20+10.3)/76.5 = 0.79 s into the trip, the cavity lives about 0.6·trev = 4.6 s, and the rejoin spike lands at −10.3 + 1200·0.75/9.807 ≈ +81 m gauge. Set tr = 10 s and every number relaxes: ΔH = 15.3 m, Hmin = +4.7 m, no cavity, 🟢.

Engineering criteria applied